Agentic Coding: Agent Loops

Agentic Coding: Agent Loops - THE LGTM

Agentic Coding: Agent Loops

The most important shift in 2026 is the emergence of long-running autonomous workflows. Instead of responding to a single prompt, agents now operate through execution loops — plan, code, test, fix, repeat.

Last Updated: April 5, 2026

The Agent Loop Architecture

At its core, an agent loop is simple:

  1. Plan: Analyze the task and create a strategy
  2. Execute: Write code, run commands, make changes
  3. Verify: Run tests, check outputs, validate results
  4. Reflect: Compare results to expectations
  5. Iterate: Fix issues, adjust approach, try again

The magic isn't in any single step — it's in the loop itself. Failed tool calls, empty results, ambiguous responses all trigger revised strategies. The model has visibility into downstream outcomes and can self-correct.

Why Loops Matter

Without iteration, agents are just chatbots:

  • ❌ Cannot recover from failure
  • ❌ No visibility into downstream outcomes
  • ❌ Single-shot responses to complex problems
  • ❌ No adaptation to changing conditions

With loops:

  • ✅ Failed tests trigger debugging
  • ✅ Type errors trigger fixes
  • ✅ Runtime exceptions trigger investigation
  • ✅ Ambiguous requirements trigger clarification

Loop Types

1. REPL-Style Loops (Claude Code, Aider)

Interactive back-and-forth. User provides input, agent responds, user provides more input. Best for exploratory work.

Pattern:

User: "Add user authentication"
Agent: Plans, writes code, shows diff
User: "Use JWT instead of sessions"
Agent: Updates code, shows changes
User: "Add password validation"
Agent: Implements, runs tests

2. Background Loops (Cursor Background Agents, GitHub Copilot Coding Agent)

Agent works asynchronously while user does other tasks. Best for parallelizable work.

Pattern:

User: assigns GitHub issue to agent
Agent: checks out branch, implements feature
Agent: runs tests, fixes failures
Agent: creates PR with description
User: reviews when ready

3. Multi-Agent Loops (Google Antigravity, OpenAI Codex Desktop)

Multiple specialized agents working in parallel. Best for complex, multi-faceted tasks.

Pattern:

Planning Agent: breaks down requirements
Frontend Agent: implements UI components
Backend Agent: builds API endpoints
Testing Agent: writes and runs tests
Integration Agent: coordinates, validates

4. Spec-Driven Loops (Kiro)

Structured requirements guide the loop. Best for production software requiring consistency.

Pattern:

Spec: defines requirements, design, tasks
Agent: works through spec methodically
Hooks: validate at each stage
Review: human approves before proceeding

Error Recovery Patterns

Retry with Backoff

Transient failures (network, rate limits) → wait and retry with exponential backoff

Alternative Strategy

Approach failed → try different implementation, library, or algorithm

Escalation

Agent stuck → pause, ask human for direction, preserve context

Rollback

Changes broke something → revert to last known good state, try different approach

Decomposition

Task too complex → break into smaller sub-tasks, tackle individually

Loop Control Mechanisms

Iteration Limits

Prevent infinite loops. Common defaults:

  • Simple tasks: 5-10 iterations
  • Complex features: 20-50 iterations
  • Research tasks: 100+ iterations with checkpoints

Timeout Guards

Maximum time per loop iteration:

  • Fast feedback loops: 30 seconds
  • Test suites: 5 minutes
  • Full builds: 30 minutes

Cost Ceilings

Token or credit limits to prevent runaway costs

Human Checkpoints

Require approval at critical points:

  • Before destructive operations (deploy, delete)
  • Before committing to main branch
  • After significant architectural changes

Designing Effective Loops

Clear Exit Conditions

Define what "done" means:

  • All tests pass
  • Specific functionality works
  • Code review approved
  • Performance benchmarks met

Rich Feedback

Each iteration needs signal:

  • Test results (pass/fail + output)
  • Type checker output
  • Linter warnings
  • Runtime logs

State Management

Loops need memory:

  • What was tried
  • What failed and why
  • What patterns worked
  • Current hypothesis

Context Pruning

Long loops accumulate noise:

  • Summarize successful iterations
  • Drop irrelevant old attempts
  • Keep failure patterns that inform current approach

Common Loop Anti-Patterns

🚩 Oscillation

Agent flips between two approaches, neither working. Fix: Force third alternative or human intervention.

🚩 Depth-First Rabbit Holes

Agent chases one error deep into unrelated code. Fix: Breadth-first exploration, step back periodically.

🚩 Premature Optimization

Agent refactors working code repeatedly. Fix: Clear "good enough" criteria, time-box polishing.

🚩 Confidence Drift

Agent makes increasingly speculative changes. Fix: Validate assumptions, run tests frequently.

🚩 Context Collapse

Long conversation loses track of original goal. Fix: Periodic goal restatement, compact context.

Simon Willison's Unified Logging Pattern

For agents to monitor their own operations and recover from errors:

{
  "timestamp": "2026-04-05T09:23:00Z",
  "agent_id": "builder-001",
  "iteration": 7,
  "action": "run_tests",
  "input": { "files_changed": ["auth.js", "user.test.js"] },
  "output": { "passed": 12, "failed": 2, "duration_ms": 4500 },
  "status": "partial_failure",
  "next_action": "fix_failing_tests"
}

Structured logs enable:

  • Pattern recognition across runs
  • Failure analysis
  • Progress tracking
  • State recovery after crashes

Harness Engineering

The infrastructure that runs agent loops is called a "harness." Key components:

  • Sandbox: Isolated execution environment
  • Tool Registry: Available capabilities
  • State Store: Persistence between iterations
  • Event Bus: Communication between components
  • Observer: Logging, monitoring, human visibility
  • Controller: Loop orchestration and limits

Production harnesses (OpenAI Codex, Claude Code Teams) include:

  • Git integration with worktrees
  • CI/CD pipeline triggers
  • Review queue management
  • Audit logging

Loop Performance Tuning

Fast Feedback

Run relevant subset of tests, not full suite:

# Instead of
npm test

# Run only changed
jest --onlyChanged

Parallel Execution

Independent checks run simultaneously:

  • Type check + lint + format in parallel
  • Unit tests + integration tests split

Smart Caching

Skip work when inputs haven't changed:

  • Dependency install (node_modules)
  • Build artifacts
  • Test results for unchanged files

The Bottom Line

Agent loops are the difference between AI-assisted coding and AI-driven development. The sophistication of your loop architecture determines:

  • How autonomous your agents can be
  • How much you can trust their outputs
  • How much human oversight is required
  • How well they handle edge cases

Start simple: A tight feedback loop with good tests beats a complex multi-agent system with poor observability.

Further Reading